I'd like to spank the Academy

gangsofnyDirected by Martin Scorsese

There were two discs in the DVD case when I picked this movie up from the library, but I figured that one was the movie and one had special features like most DVDs do. Nope! I was wrong. For whatever reason, this movie is spread over two DVDs, with parts of the movie and special features on both discs. Yes, Gangs of New York is a long movie, but it’s shorter than Saving Private Ryan and The Thin Red Line, and they each managed to be on one disc. I kind of get the feeling that whoever made that decision wanted to make the movie feel more epic, but it really just made it seem long.

So what’s the story? In New York City in 1846, two rival gangs battle it out for supremacy. Bill the Butcher, the leader of the American-born Natives, kills the Priest, leader of the Irish Dead Rabbits. Sixteen years later, Amsterdam, the son of the Priest, comes back for revenge.

The Good: The set direction was fabulous. Every little detail combined to make me feel like I had been transported back to the 1860s. I thought the costume design was good, too, but this movie made me realize that I know very little about historical clothing when it comes to the poor, so I could be wrong on this one. But I can’t imagine anyone would put men in those ridiculously ugly plaid trousers unless it was accurate.

The story was good one. Revenge plots are always exciting, and there were some good moments where Amsterdam struggled between admiration of Bill the Butcher and his desire for revenge.

The best acting in the movie was done by men in supporting roles. The standout actor was Brendan Gleeson. He didn’t have a lot of screen time in his role as an Irish mercenary unaffiliated with any gang, but he played his part so convincingly. His scenes were among the best in the movie. Jim Broadbent as real-life corrupt politician Boss Tweed was hilarious, and Gary Lewis made a very intense Irishman in the wrong gang. The only lead actor who did a very good job was Daniel Day-Lewis. His performance was sometimes over the top, but so was his gang-leader character, so it worked.

The Bad: Leonardo DiCaprio. His acting wasn’t terrible all the time, but his Irish accent came and went, especially when he narrated. Were there no actors that were actually Irish that could have played the part? It would have helped a lot.

The story followed Amsterdam as he followed his plan to get revenge on Bill the Butcher. Everything led up to that, and then the climax was actually about the New York City draft riots of 1863. Yes, the draft and the dissatisfaction of the poor people about it were touched on throughout the movie, but not enough for it to be the climax. I thought that that was kind of sloppy storytelling. Also, sixteen years after 1846 would have been 1862, not 1863, so they got their year wrong, too.

Also, what were so many Chinese people doing in New York in the 1860s? Especially Chinese women? That rang false. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Chinese immigrants on the West Coast at the time, but I don’t think there were very many in New York.

The Ugly: When I told my younger brother about my quest to watch these movies, he said he’d seen some nominees from 2002 and that Gangs of New York was a pretty good movie – except Cameron Diaz ruined it. Now that I’ve seen it, I have to agree. I feel like Amsterdam was so focused on revenge that he wouldn’t have the emotion left over to fall in love. If he did fall in love, it would have to be with someone amazing. Cameron Diaz never made me feel like Jenny Everdeane was anything special. She spent most of the movie looking either smug or confused. Maybe another actress could have done a better job, but since Cameron Diaz was chosen, that part of the story should have been left out altogether.

Speaking of leaving things out…This movie is almost three hours long, and I felt every second of it. It actually took me over four and half hours to watch because I kept falling asleep and having to find my place again. Granted, I had a cold, but still. Other three-hour movies have managed to keep my attention. Saving Private Ryan is actually a little bit longer than Gangs of New York, but I was surprised to find that out because the time flies by in Saving Private Ryan. I’m not asking for non-stop action; I like character development and plot intricacies. But this movie had too many scenes that didn’t move the action along or even really develop the characters. It needed to be cut down.

Oscars Won: None

Oscar Nominations: Best picture; best actor in a leading role (Daniel Day-Lewis); best director; best writing, original screenplay; best cinematography; best art direction – set direction; best costume design; best film editing; best sound; best music, original song (“The Hands That Built America”).

Comments on: "Gangs of New York (2002)" (9)

  1. Hm. Not sure about this movie–if I watch it, it’ll be just for the setting and costumes. I’ve never been a huge fan of Leonardo DiCaprio–I think he’s a fine enough actor, I guess, but he’s never once convinced me to like his character–and I don’t think Cameron Diaz has ever managed to not annoy me in something. (False! She was great in “Best Friend’s Wedding.”) On the other hand, Boss Tweed! Revenge! Irish accents (of variable quality)! (Also, there are two DADA instructors in this film? 1860s NYC Voldemort better watch out!)

    Also, I always snicker when a Best Picture nominee wins nothing AT ALL, in any categories. It feels more insulting than not getting nominated in the first place. Incidentally, who did win best costume design that year? (If only there were a repository or trivial movie facts where I could find that out for myself, right?)

    Like

    • The only movie that Cameron Diaz hasn’t bugged me in is Night and Day, which I inexplicably liked even though I don’t care for either of the two leads. And it would have been hilarious if the Danial Day-Lewis part had been played by Ralph Fiennes. Also, I might have forgotten to mention that the gang leader who gets killed at the beginning is played by Liam Neeson, if you wanted an excuse to watch.

      Like

  2. Ooooh this is the year of “Chicago,” huh? I guess the costume design in that one was okay. I can’t compare the two because I haven’t seen this one yet.

    Like

  3. Yesssss Liam Neeson is the best. Honestly, I’d probably watch it just for the random plaid pants tho. I’m kind of lacking good stuff to watch lately. Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes should be in more movies. Hey! Ralph Fiennes is M now! That will be fun.

    Why is it that the actors with the most gravitas (Sean Bean in GoT, Liam Neeson in Star Wars) are always killed off early in the story? Dangnabit.

    (And by “The Story” for Star Wars, I am of course referring to the entire six-film story arc and not the Phantom Menace, in which he does indeed stay alive until the climax.)

    Like

    • You could probably google pics from the movie and find pictures of the plaid pants; they show up a lot. That would save you from watching a three-hour long mediocre movie.

      Like

  4. You should figure out how to make it so I can reply to specific posts rather than reply to the entire thread. I would like to reply to your comment specifically but I can’t figure out how.

    And the comment I was going to comment was “Ew, everthing about ‘Night and Day’ screamed ‘DON’T WATCH ME! DON’T WATCH ME!'” But I’m glad it allowed you to glimpse a non-annoying Diaz. Was that just in comparison to Tom Cruise, do you think?

    Does that mean you didn’t like her in ‘Best Friend’s Wedding’, or that you haven’t seen it? Because her character is kind of annoyingly precious, but I think that’s the vibe Diaz was supposed to be going for.

    Like

    • I have never actually seen My Best Friend’s Wedding, mostly because I tend to hate movies where a couple is perfectly happy and a third person decides that he/she would be ten billion times better for the man/woman in said couple and proceeds to try to break them up. Let people be happy, dang it!

      Like

  5. But that’s the great thing about it–she has to confront that fact that she was totally inappropriate to try to break them up! There is accountability! And great 90s fashion.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: